[clang] [clang-tools-extra] RFC: [clang-tidy] [analyzer] Nondeterministic pointer usage improvements (PR #110471)

[Carlos Galvez via cfe-commits]

carlosgalvezp wrote:

> > Why isn't `misc` suitable for this use case?
> 
> `bugprone` was just an initial thought. If the group think leads us to `misc` I'm ok with moving in that direction. Other thoughts?

Maybe i misunderstood, I thought you meant creating a new clang-tidy module called `advisory`. `bugprone` sounds good to me!

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110471