[clang] [clang-tools-extra] RFC: [clang-tidy] [analyzer] Nondeterministic pointer usage improvements (PR #110471)

[Carlos Galvez via cfe-commits]

carlosgalvezp wrote:

> creation of an advisory group.

Why isn't `misc` suitable for this use case? It would be confusing to have both groups I think, and may lead to bike-shedding discussions in the future about where a check belongs in misc or advisory.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110471