[clang] [clang-tools-extra] RFC: [clang-tidy] [analyzer] Nondeterministic pointer usage improvements (PR #110471)

[via cfe-commits]

vabridgers wrote:

As I understand the collective comments so far:

- use `misc`, not `bugprone`. I've heard no affirmations for `bugprone` and one suggestion to use `misc`.
- Break up the simulation header files, only include what's actually needed for the test
- change the checker name to something like `bugprone-nondeterministic-pointer-iteration-order`
- provide testing results, expand upon testing
- I've heard no concrete comments on expanding beyond the few cases this check currently addresses. I'll assume that's ok for now.

Next update should address these points. Thanks for the comments!


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110471