[PATCH] D128645: Update developer policy.

Edd Barrett via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 27 09:07:32 PDT 2022


vext01 added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst:112-114
-When submitting patches, please do not add confidentiality or non-disclosure
-notices to the patches themselves.  These notices conflict with the LLVM
-licensing terms and may result in your contribution being excluded.
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> I don't think we want to lose this bit either, as I don't think this advice has changed.
Oops, you are right. My bad!


================
Comment at: llvm/docs/DeveloperPolicy.rst:419-421
-Your first commit to a repository may require the autogenerated email to be
-approved by a moderator of the mailing list.
-This is normal and will be done when the mailing list owner has time.
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> Rather than get rid of this, I think we might actually want to broaden it. I read this blurb as letting folks know that sometimes commit messages take a while before they show up on the commit list. It used to be the primary way that happened was when making a commit for the first time. Now it happens most often for large commits (due to the size of the email content) or a long list of CCs (often added automatically by Herald, though the moderation of these has gotten better in recent history).
> 
> I think it's kind of helpful to let people know that sometimes the automated emails get caught out by moderation. But if others don't think that's of value to mention, then we can go ahead and remove this bit.
Actually, now I read it again, I realise that I don't understand what this sentence means:

> Your first commit to a repository may require the autogenerated email to be approved by a moderator of the mailing list.

My first commit to a llvm repository was via github, and github doesn't discriminate. If you have write-access to the repo, then your push to `main` will surely go ahead. There are no automated emails involved as far as I know.

I suspect this prose is from pre-github, where the process was different?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D128645/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D128645



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list