[cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?

Chandler Carruth chandlerc at google.com
Wed Jun 20 23:22:59 PDT 2012

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:00 PM, "C. Bergström"
<cbergstrom at pathscale.com>wrote:

> On 06/21/12 12:47 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>  On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com<mailto:
>> nlewycky at google.com>> wrote:
>>    Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs
>>    to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't
>>    have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe
>>    are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build
>>    system doesn't implement?
>>    If nobody pipes up, I might actually try actually removing it!
>> FWIW, I'm also under the impression that Apple's internal release process
>> depends on configure+make as well.
> clang/llvm are advertised as being independent of Apple.  There's a ton of
> companies using the project, but we should let them speak-up if they
> *really* need it to stay around.

Oh come on, I'm trying to help relay information. ;] I'm not saying we're
beholden, I'm saying we do have actual users of this. :: eye roll ::
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/attachments/20120620/dafc547a/attachment.html>

More information about the cfe-dev mailing list