[cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet?
cbergstrom at pathscale.com
Wed Jun 20 23:00:24 PDT 2012
On 06/21/12 12:47 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com
> <mailto:nlewycky at google.com>> wrote:
> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs
> to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't
> have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe
> are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build
> system doesn't implement?
> If nobody pipes up, I might actually try actually removing it!
> FWIW, I'm also under the impression that Apple's internal release
> process depends on configure+make as well.
clang/llvm are advertised as being independent of Apple. There's a ton
of companies using the project, but we should let them speak-up if they
*really* need it to stay around.
+1 for removing autoconf dep
More information about the cfe-dev