[Openmp-commits] Openmp-commits post from pawel.osmialowski at arm.com requires approval

C Bergström via Openmp-commits openmp-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 22 02:44:05 PDT 2016

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Paul Osmialowski <pawel.osmialowski at arm.com>
> To: pawel.osmialowski at arm.com, jonathan.l.peyton at intel.com, james.molloy at arm.com
> Cc: amara.emerson at arm.com, openmp-commits at lists.llvm.org, renato.golin at linaro.org
> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:37:02 +0000
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] D19319: ARM Limited license agreement from the copyright/patent holder
> pawosm01 added a reviewer: jmolloy.
> Repository:
>   rL LLVM
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D19319

I'm not sure how much of my ARMv8 work is actually copyright
PathScale, but I don't think every company which contributes to
llvm/clang/llvm-openmp needs to push some "license" agreement. If a
license agreement is required it would make more sense for some
non-profit to receive a copy and steward it..

I'm not opposed to ARM's push, but it just caught me as weird. Is this
some oddball ARM internal legal requirement?

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: openmp-commits-request at lists.llvm.org
> To:
> Cc:
> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 02:34:43 -0700
> Subject: confirm 586d4c2de9d1f7404c82499e85785392ce705d55
> If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
> Mailman will discard the held message.  Do this if the message is
> spam.  If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
> with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
> to the list.  The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
> of the body of the reply.

More information about the Openmp-commits mailing list