[llvm-dev] Contributing Bazel BUILD files similar to gn

[Sterling Augustine via llvm-dev]

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 2:01 PM Dave Lee <davelee.com at gmail.com> wrote:

> What would be the hassle to cmake users?
>

Nothing that can't be addressed by policy, such as:

1. No public Bazel buildbots blaming them when the build breaks.
2. Cmake changes are not reverted to due issues with bazel.
2. Requiring that things implemented in bazel also needs to be implemented
in cmake. "Things" is somewhat vague here, because there are things that
can be done in bazel that can't be done in cmake. But as long as both
systems can build everything (bazel's power of analysis is much greater), I
think this would be acceptable.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201029/ad7fe3de/attachment.html>