[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

Tue Oct 27 16:57:27 PDT 2020

Hello Vitaly,

This should be fixed.

Please let me know if you still see the issue.

Thanks

Galina

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 4:45 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:

> It looks fixed. I haven't seen them in recent reports.
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Any news regarding false-negatives?
>>
>> +Mitch Phillips <mitchp at google.com>
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Vitaly.
>>> Somebody is looking at this.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There is some issue, at least on staging.
>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed
>>>>> stages but marked as SUCCESS
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging
>>>>>>> area! Much appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the
>>>>>>> production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was
>>>>>>>> frequently offline.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <
>>>>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if
>>>>>>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you
>>>>>>>>> move all the green bots back there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <
>>>>>>>>> vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They do on staging.
>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
>>>>>>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have
>>>>>>>>>> colors.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot
>>>>>>>>>>> annotated commands:
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>>>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's
>>>>>>>>>>> OK for now.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <
>>>>>>>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It
>>>>>>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>>>>>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production
>>>>>>>>>>>> build bot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lldb-commits <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it will need more love and care.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> porting AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> earlier. I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> things to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> flexibility to test steps locally and make changes to the steps without
>>>>>>>>>>>>> restarting the buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a script that you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dep requirements of the script.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> may need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201027/e1a2f6d6/attachment.html>