[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev]

It looks fixed. I haven't seen them in recent reports.

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 at 16:32, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:

> Any news regarding false-negatives?
>
> +Mitch Phillips <mitchp at google.com>
>
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 22:07, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Vitaly.
>> Somebody is looking at this.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:56 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> it's not just staging, this build must be marked as failed
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/74/builds/122
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:50, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is some issue, at least on staging.
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed
>>>> stages but marked as SUCCESS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> Done.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging
>>>>>> area! Much appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the
>>>>>> production. It has a new AnnotatedCommand now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was
>>>>>>> frequently offline.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if
>>>>>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you
>>>>>>>> move all the green bots back there.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They do on staging.
>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
>>>>>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot
>>>>>>>>>> annotated commands:
>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's
>>>>>>>>>> OK for now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <
>>>>>>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It
>>>>>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>>>>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production
>>>>>>>>>>> build bot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via
>>>>>>>>>>>> lldb-commits <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but it will need more love and care.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> porting AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things
>>>>>>>>>>>> to use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to
>>>>>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the
>>>>>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that
>>>>>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements
>>>>>>>>>>>> of the script.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may
>>>>>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201027/deff1a3c/attachment.html>