[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev]

Thanks!
Done.

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area!
> Much appreciated.
>
> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. It
> has a new AnnotatedCommand now.
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was
>> frequently offline.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks everyone!
>>>
>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if
>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you
>>> move all the green bots back there.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Galina
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> They do on staging.
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>
>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot
>>>>> annotated commands:
>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK
>>>>> for now.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It
>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build
>>>>>> bot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
>>>>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it
>>>>>>>> will need more love and care.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting
>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I
>>>>>>> and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to
>>>>>>> use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to
>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the
>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that
>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements
>>>>>>> of the script.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need
>>>>>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201019/d1343f43/attachment.html>