[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Vitaly Buka via llvm-dev]

There is some issue, at least on staging.
http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/89/builds/184 has multiple failed
stages but marked as SUCCESS


On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 11:43, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:

> Thanks!
> Done.
>
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 12:45, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area!
>> Much appreciated.
>>
>> Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production.
>> It has a new AnnotatedCommand now.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Galina
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was
>>> frequently offline.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks everyone!
>>>>
>>>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if
>>>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you
>>>> move all the green bots back there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Galina
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> They do on staging.
>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>>
>>>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
>>>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot
>>>>>> annotated commands:
>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK
>>>>>> for now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <
>>>>>> gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It
>>>>>>> should be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build
>>>>>>> bot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Galina
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
>>>>>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
>>>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but
>>>>>>>>> it will need more love and care.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting
>>>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I
>>>>>>>> and another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to
>>>>>>>> use more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to
>>>>>>>> test steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the
>>>>>>>> buildbot master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that
>>>>>>>> you can run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements
>>>>>>>> of the script.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may
>>>>>>>> need some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201019/eea3c0bd/attachment.html>