[llvm-dev] [Lldb-commits] Upcoming upgrade of LLVM buildbot

[Galina Kistanova via llvm-dev]

Thanks everyone for keeping your annotated builders in the staging area!
Much appreciated.

Please feel free to move all the green builders back to the production. It
has a new AnnotatedCommand now.

Thanks

Galina


On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:46 AM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com> wrote:

> Ok, I can switch them back to staging. However today's staging was
> frequently offline.
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 at 21:44, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks everyone!
>>
>> I would like to keep the bots in the staging till Friday. And if
>> everything is good, then apply the changes to the production and let you
>> move all the green bots back there.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Galina
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 10:43 PM Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka at google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> They do on staging.
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>
>>> Galina, when do you plan to push this to the primary server?
>>> If it's a few days, I'd rather keep bots on staging to have colors.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 11:11, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> FWIW, I don't see any issues with my two bots that use buildbot
>>>> annotated commands:
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/sanitizer-windows
>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/clang-x64-windows-msvc
>>>> The individual steps don't highlight as green or red, but that's OK for
>>>> now.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:19 PM Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We have a better version of AnnotatedCommand on the staging. It should
>>>>> be a functional equivalent of the old one.
>>>>> We need to stress test it well before moving to the production build
>>>>> bot.
>>>>>
>>>>> For that we need all sanitizer + other bots which use the
>>>>> AnnotatedCommand directly or indirectly moved temporarily to the staging.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please let me know when that could be arranged.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Galina
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 11:39 AM Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 4:32 PM Galina Kistanova via lldb-commits <
>>>>>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They are online now -
>>>>>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/waterfall?tags=sanitizer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand has severe design conflict with the new buildbot.
>>>>>>> We have changed it to be safe and still do something useful, but it
>>>>>>> will need more love and care.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please let me know if you have some spare time to work on porting
>>>>>>> AnnotatedCommand.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's unfortunate, it would've been good to know that earlier. I and
>>>>>> another team member have spent a fair amount of time porting things to use
>>>>>> more AnnotatedCommand steps, because it gives us the flexibility to test
>>>>>> steps locally and make changes to the steps without restarting the buildbot
>>>>>> master. IMO that is the Right Way to define steps: a script that you can
>>>>>> run locally on a machine that satisfies the OS and dep requirements of the
>>>>>> script.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am restarting the two bots that I am responsible for, and may need
>>>>>> some help debugging further issues soon. I'll let you know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201017/7d4f6b83/attachment.html>