[llvm-dev] [PITCH#2] Improvements to LLVM Decision Making

[Dmitri Gribenko via llvm-dev]

Thank you for working on this, Chris! This proposal solves a very important
issue. It looks good to me and I would support using this process in LLVM
and subprojects.

Dmitri


On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:28 AM Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Thank you for everyone that participated in the first round of the
> discussion
> <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-January/138267.html>.
> I’ve incorporated feedback into the draft of the proposal, and I’d
> appreciate it if you could take another look and share your thoughts.
>
> One piece of feedback is that GitHub gists aren’t great for detailed
> feedback and iteration, so I moved the proposal to a google doc here
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q8w-oGH9bgU-0R27k4LCUJbLGnWGZRO3GtVo8PvifBw/edit#>.
> There is also a draft of the proposal template here
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TwynIdQFYagglkHEpBgeZJb9ehWBU4qVUeTu94B3FIY/edit#>.
> I consider the proposal process to be the first trial run for the proposal
> process itself :-).  Once the drafts converge, we’ll get things checked in
> and aligned to the process.
>
> That said, I’d really like feedback ahead of the “official” discussion to
> help shape this.  Please either comment on the google docs or in this
> thread.  Thanks!
>
> -Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>


-- 
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200602/e946d52b/attachment.html>