[llvm-dev] [Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis

[Vikram TV via llvm-dev]

I hope the proposal is fine with the community. Should I wait on this
thread a little longer before I start updating the patch?

>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:33 AM, JF Bastien <jfb at google.com> wrote:

>
>> A primary drawback in the above patch is the static use of Cache Line
>> Size. I wish to get this data from tblgen/TTI and I am happy to submit
>> patches on it.
>>
>> Yes, this sounds like the right direction. The targets obviously need to
>> provide this information.
>>
>
> I'd like to help review this as it'll be necessary to implement
> http://wg21.link/p0154r1 which is (likely) in C++17.
>
Thanks!

>
>

>

>



-- 

Good time...
Vikram TV
CompilerTree Technologies
Mysore, Karnataka, INDIA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160615/d8cc9b54/attachment.html>