[llvm-dev] [Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis

[Vikram TV via llvm-dev]

Ping!

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Vikram TV <vikram.tarikere at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> I hope the proposal is fine with the community. Should I wait on this
> thread a little longer before I start updating the patch?
>
>>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 4:33 AM, JF Bastien <jfb at google.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> A primary drawback in the above patch is the static use of Cache Line
>>> Size. I wish to get this data from tblgen/TTI and I am happy to submit
>>> patches on it.
>>>
>>> Yes, this sounds like the right direction. The targets obviously need to
>>> provide this information.
>>>
>>
>> I'd like to help review this as it'll be necessary to implement
>> http://wg21.link/p0154r1 which is (likely) in C++17.
>>
> Thanks!
>
>>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Good time...
> Vikram TV
> CompilerTree Technologies
> Mysore, Karnataka, INDIA
>



-- 

Good time...
Vikram TV
CompilerTree Technologies
Mysore, Karnataka, INDIA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160621/107d72ff/attachment.html>