[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update

Tamas Berghammer tberghammer at google.com
Wed Jul 8 01:31:00 PDT 2015


Hi Manual,

Since the Phabricator update I noticed that the username of the reviewer
isn't displayed for some comment added to the review (e.g.:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11016). Can you check it out what is causing this
issue?

Thanks,
Tamas

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:50 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:02 AM Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 at 01:43 Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:27 PM Jonathan Roelofs <
>>> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Even further off topic, in phab wishlist land: It'd be awesome if it
>>>> were capable of inferring extended patch context by looking at the svn
>>>> repo/git mirrors (rather than requiring the person submitting the patch
>>>> to re-upload with -U999).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yea, this is hard, because detecting which path a patch goes against is
>>> hard (for example, if the patch path is a pure add for a new tools/sometool
>>> directory, is it in clang or llvm?) and requiring people to do global
>>> top-level llvm patches seems rather problematic.
>>>
>>> The workaround is to use arc diff (the command line tool).
>>>
>>
>> Speaking of which, in case anyone else has issues with arc today, this
>> might save you a minute or two.
>>
>> $ arc diff
>> Exception
>> ERR-CONDUIT-CALL: API Method "differential.query" does not define these
>> parameters: 'arcanistProjects'.
>> (Run with --trace for a full exception trace.)
>>
>> Fix this by upgrading with "arc upgrade".
>>
>> Then, say you're sending a patch for Clang, you'll need to use
>> "cfe-commits-list" in the subscriber list instead of "cfe-commits".
>> Otherwise you get:
>>
>> """
>> Commit message has errors:
>>       - Error parsing field "Subscribers": The objects you have listed
>>       include objects which do not exist (cfe-commits).
>> """
>>
>> (this might be temporary?)
>>
>
> Thanks for reporting - this happened as part of the upgrade automatically
> (mailing lists were migrated to mailing list users). Changed the names
> back, you should be able to type cfe-commits/llvm-commits/lldb-commits
> again.
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jon
>>>>
>>>> On 7/2/15 10:52 AM, Keno Fischer wrote:
>>>> > This might be slightly off topic, but I'd really like a way to be able
>>>> > to run the buildbots off a Phabricator Diff before committing.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com
>>>> > <mailto:klimek at google.com>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >     Unfortunately threading will be broken for changes currently under
>>>> >     review (new patches shouldn't have the problem).
>>>> >     I'm very sorry for this inconvenience :(
>>>> >
>>>> >     On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:47 PM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com
>>>> >     <mailto:klimek at google.com>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >         Greetings llvm'ers,
>>>> >
>>>> >         I'm working on an update to phabricator that brings our fork
>>>> >         significantly closer to the upstream version, thus making
>>>> >         maintenance much easier; this will allow us to upgrade more
>>>> often.
>>>> >
>>>> >         Upstream has fixed many issues and introduced new ways to
>>>> >         customize the email flow, so
>>>> >
>>>> >         a) while rolling out the new version I'll be fiddling with
>>>> >         config settings; during that time, you might see emails that
>>>> are
>>>> >         not yet what we'll want the end-state to be; I'll announce on
>>>> >         this thread once this is done
>>>> >
>>>> >         b) the new version gives people more control over the emails;
>>>> >         that means, if you're a phab user, you might get some emails
>>>> >         that the list doesn't get (if you wish to); you can configure
>>>> >         that from phab's email settings
>>>> >
>>>> >         Once this is finished, please respond on this thread with your
>>>> >         concerns / comments, or file bugs at
>>>> >         https://llvm.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Website
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DWebsite&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=W103a0YcLyjwDrTAWoFBe3Uu-dnd8C25faPQ_R6tCes&s=l2z19ixng4bNngaOKUrrMcJuK_MKRswvSTSHI6Oz3do&e=>
>>>> >         <
>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DWebsite&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=Fvpa2efUGHSMDfoEJVFnwPMyOv6rPysb__oHeZH6MWI&s=cElWnsknBCk276Ol0-2baMtws6DjzsduR1uVw_4RSOI&e=
>>>> >.
>>>> >
>>>> >         Cheers,
>>>> >         /Manuel
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>>> >     LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>> >     LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
>>>> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> >     http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > cfe-dev mailing list
>>>> > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jon Roelofs
>>>> jonathan at codesourcery.com
>>>> CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150708/16bd34e1/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list