[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phabricator update

[Manuel Klimek]

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 10:02 AM Andrew Wilkins <axwalk at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 at 01:43 Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:27 PM Jonathan Roelofs <
>> jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Even further off topic, in phab wishlist land: It'd be awesome if it
>>> were capable of inferring extended patch context by looking at the svn
>>> repo/git mirrors (rather than requiring the person submitting the patch
>>> to re-upload with -U999).
>>>
>>
>> Yea, this is hard, because detecting which path a patch goes against is
>> hard (for example, if the patch path is a pure add for a new tools/sometool
>> directory, is it in clang or llvm?) and requiring people to do global
>> top-level llvm patches seems rather problematic.
>>
>> The workaround is to use arc diff (the command line tool).
>>
>
> Speaking of which, in case anyone else has issues with arc today, this
> might save you a minute or two.
>
> $ arc diff
> Exception
> ERR-CONDUIT-CALL: API Method "differential.query" does not define these
> parameters: 'arcanistProjects'.
> (Run with --trace for a full exception trace.)
>
> Fix this by upgrading with "arc upgrade".
>
> Then, say you're sending a patch for Clang, you'll need to use
> "cfe-commits-list" in the subscriber list instead of "cfe-commits".
> Otherwise you get:
>
> """
> Commit message has errors:
>       - Error parsing field "Subscribers": The objects you have listed
>       include objects which do not exist (cfe-commits).
> """
>
> (this might be temporary?)
>

Thanks for reporting - this happened as part of the upgrade automatically
(mailing lists were migrated to mailing list users). Changed the names
back, you should be able to type cfe-commits/llvm-commits/lldb-commits
again.


>
> Cheers,
> Andrew
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On 7/2/15 10:52 AM, Keno Fischer wrote:
>>> > This might be slightly off topic, but I'd really like a way to be able
>>> > to run the buildbots off a Phabricator Diff before committing.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com
>>> > <mailto:klimek at google.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     Unfortunately threading will be broken for changes currently under
>>> >     review (new patches shouldn't have the problem).
>>> >     I'm very sorry for this inconvenience :(
>>> >
>>> >     On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:47 PM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com
>>> >     <mailto:klimek at google.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >         Greetings llvm'ers,
>>> >
>>> >         I'm working on an update to phabricator that brings our fork
>>> >         significantly closer to the upstream version, thus making
>>> >         maintenance much easier; this will allow us to upgrade more
>>> often.
>>> >
>>> >         Upstream has fixed many issues and introduced new ways to
>>> >         customize the email flow, so
>>> >
>>> >         a) while rolling out the new version I'll be fiddling with
>>> >         config settings; during that time, you might see emails that
>>> are
>>> >         not yet what we'll want the end-state to be; I'll announce on
>>> >         this thread once this is done
>>> >
>>> >         b) the new version gives people more control over the emails;
>>> >         that means, if you're a phab user, you might get some emails
>>> >         that the list doesn't get (if you wish to); you can configure
>>> >         that from phab's email settings
>>> >
>>> >         Once this is finished, please respond on this thread with your
>>> >         concerns / comments, or file bugs at
>>> >         https://llvm.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=Website
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DWebsite&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=W103a0YcLyjwDrTAWoFBe3Uu-dnd8C25faPQ_R6tCes&s=l2z19ixng4bNngaOKUrrMcJuK_MKRswvSTSHI6Oz3do&e=>
>>> >         <
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__llvm.org_bugs_enter-5Fbug.cgi-3Fproduct-3DWebsite&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=Mfk2qtn1LTDThVkh6-oGglNfMADXfJdty4_bhmuhMHA&m=Fvpa2efUGHSMDfoEJVFnwPMyOv6rPysb__oHeZH6MWI&s=cElWnsknBCk276Ol0-2baMtws6DjzsduR1uVw_4RSOI&e=
>>> >.
>>> >
>>> >         Cheers,
>>> >         /Manuel
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>> >     LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> >     LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
>>> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>> >     http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > cfe-dev mailing list
>>> > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jon Roelofs
>>> jonathan at codesourcery.com
>>> CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150703/1fcbd60d/attachment.html>