[LLVMdev] test-suite wrongly using big-endian results

[Renato Golin]

On 26 February 2014 18:00, Robert Lytton <robert at xmos.com> wrote:
> The question is are __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ & __BIG_ENDIAN__ defines becoming 'standard'?

They're redundant with __ORDER_*_ENDIAN__, so I personally wouldn't
even emit them. Even though code might have start depending on them
and it could be hard to deprecate it, I'd still go through. It's not
like people would have to re-implement anything, this is a simple
regex's job.


> Do we want all targets to have one or the other?

I'd say every target needs one of the __ORDER_*_ENDIAN__ options, yes,
and also __BYTE_ORDER__ set.

cheers,
--renato