[LLVMdev] test-suite wrongly using big-endian results

[Joerg Sonnenberger]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 06:00:26PM +0000, Robert Lytton wrote:
> The question is are __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ & __BIG_ENDIAN__ defines becoming 'standard'?
> Do we want all targets to have one or the other?
> Still waiting for feedback...

At the very least NetBSD always wants to have __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ /
__BIG_ENDIAN__ as they are much older than __ORDER_*.

Joerg