[LLVMdev] test-suite wrongly using big-endian results

[Robert Lytton]

Hi Renato,

You are quite right.

The question is are __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ & __BIG_ENDIAN__ defines becoming 'standard'?
Do we want all targets to have one or the other?
Still waiting for feedback...

Robert
________________________________________
From: Renato Golin [renato.golin at linaro.org]
Sent: 26 February 2014 17:11
To: Robert Lytton
Cc: Daniel Dunbar; LLVM Dev
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] test-suite wrongly using big-endian results

On 26 February 2014 14:44, Robert Lytton <robert at xmos.com> wrote:
> This is related to a patch I submitted a little while ago (still pending):
>   http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2760
>
> If accepted, would it make this patch (and a others) unnecessary?

Hi Robert,

It is, but hijacking your patch a little, why not use
__ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__? Why do we need to create __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ ?

cheers,
--renato