[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Coding standards: don't use ``inline`` when defining a function in a class definition
Dmitri Gribenko
gribozavr at gmail.com
Mon Feb 4 01:31:12 PST 2013
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This came up on IRC in context of r173842, and it was suggested to
> codify this unspoken rule.
>
> Current practice is not to use 'inline' in:
>
> class Foo {
> public:
> inline void bar() {
> // ...
> }
> };
Ping.
This patch is not changing anything, it just documents the rule we
already follow.
Dmitri
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list