[LLVMdev] Benchmarking for automatic parallelization project

Tux9 tuxding at gmail.com
Thu Dec 8 10:29:30 PST 2011


Yes, auto-parallelization is not practical, but it solves something. So it
should have benchmarks.

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 09:08, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote:

> Hi Hal,
>
> > For auto-vectorization, look at:
> > http://polaris.cs.uiuc.edu/~garzaran/doc/pact11.pdf
> > http://polaris.cs.uiuc.edu/~maleki1/TSVC.tar.gz
> >
> > If you're looking for auto-parallelization, I can ask around.
>
>   Thanks for the sharing. If that doesn't bother you too much, I would
> like to
> know auto-parallelization benchmarks. :p
>
>  Just curious. I was thinking that auto-parallelization in compiler
> optimization
> is not mature/practical, that's why I thought there is no
> auto-parallelization
> benchmark. Do you know any project on this? Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> chenwj
>
> --
> Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任)
> Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science,
> Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
> Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
> Homepage: http://people.cs.nctu.edu.tw/~chenwj
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111208/11cb23c1/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list