[LLVMdev] Wiki?

[Nipun Arora]

I agree. Being a newbie myself, I can relate to what problems someone new to
llvm would have.While I think most of the stuff I have tried will be useful,
I wouldn't be entirely sure if its the best way to go about it.

Thanks
Nipun Arora
Columbia University

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Anthony Danalis <adanalis at eecs.utk.edu>wrote:

>
> On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 11 March 2009 14:19:28 Vikram S. Adve wrote:
> >> In principle, having a Wiki like this would be valuable.  In
> >> practice,
> >> I think there will need to be some sanity checking to make sure
> >> incorrect or misleading information is not added to it.
> >
> > Yes, I think a Wiki would be extremely valuable. I would
> > particularly like to
> > see information on which aspects of LLVM have problems and what
> > conflicts
> > exist (e.g. the first-class structs vs tail calls thing). I'm not
> > sure how
> > such information could be organised though...
> >
>
>
> Probably there should be an "unreliable" section for those of us who
> want
> to contribute but are newbies and might have understood something wrong.
> Or at least a way to label something as "try this at your own risk" so
> to speak.
>
> Anthony
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090311/617dd3bf/attachment.html>