[LLVMdev] Wiki?

[someguy]

If we get the blessing of one of the old-timers who is willing to
spend a little time reviewing postings, we can deal with the
'misleading information' issue.

In addition, it might be _useful_ to understand why people were misled.

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Nipun Arora <nipun2512 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree. Being a newbie myself, I can relate to what problems someone new to
> llvm would have.
> While I think most of the stuff I have tried will be useful, I wouldn't be
> entirely sure if its the best way to go about it.
> Thanks
> Nipun Arora
> Columbia University
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Anthony Danalis <adanalis at eecs.utk.edu>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Jon Harrop wrote:
>>
>> > On Wednesday 11 March 2009 14:19:28 Vikram S. Adve wrote:
>> >> In principle, having a Wiki like this would be valuable.  In
>> >> practice,
>> >> I think there will need to be some sanity checking to make sure
>> >> incorrect or misleading information is not added to it.
>> >
>> > Yes, I think a Wiki would be extremely valuable. I would
>> > particularly like to
>> > see information on which aspects of LLVM have problems and what
>> > conflicts
>> > exist (e.g. the first-class structs vs tail calls thing). I'm not
>> > sure how
>> > such information could be organised though...
>> >
>>
>>
>> Probably there should be an "unreliable" section for those of us who
>> want
>> to contribute but are newbies and might have understood something wrong.
>> Or at least a way to label something as "try this at your own risk" so
>> to speak.
>>
>> Anthony
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>