[LLVMdev] Indirect Branch Representation

[Eli Friedman]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:47 PM, kapil anand <kapilanand2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Specifically, I need a way to represent indirect branch instruction (in
> binary) as an equivalent LLVM instruction. With switch instruction , I would
> have to list all the possible targets and then initialize the corresponding
> instruction. I was just thinking whether it might be possible to have some
> kind of indirect branch where label is a "variable" and not an explicit
> label present in module.

Oh... I think you're stuck with either a massive switch statement or tail calls.

-Eli