[llvm] [LoopVectorizer] Rename variable (NFC). (PR #180585)

[Jonas Paulsson via llvm-commits]

https://github.com/JonPsson1 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180585

Since TargetTransformInfo::enableAggressiveInterleaving(bool HasReductions) takes the HasReductions argument, the LoopVectorizer should save its returned value in a variable called AggressivelyInterleave instead of AggressivelyInterleaveReductions.

@fhahn @Mel-Chen


>From a0e3dde923268778e6035b1e4b1ad84f5ec5abee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Paulsson <paulsson at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 19:44:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Rename variable (NFC)

---
 llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
index 68e61c01c65d9..61415f1d5a738 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
@@ -4850,7 +4850,7 @@ LoopVectorizationPlanner::selectInterleaveCount(VPlan &Plan, ElementCount VF,
   LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Loop cost is " << LoopCost << '\n'
                     << "LV: IC is " << IC << '\n'
                     << "LV: VF is " << VF << '\n');
-  const bool AggressivelyInterleaveReductions =
+  const bool AggressivelyInterleave =
       TTI.enableAggressiveInterleaving(HasReductions);
   if (!ScalarInterleavingRequiresRuntimePointerCheck &&
       !ScalarInterleavingRequiresPredication && LoopCost < SmallLoopCost) {
@@ -4951,7 +4951,7 @@ LoopVectorizationPlanner::selectInterleaveCount(VPlan &Plan, ElementCount VF,
 
     // If there are scalar reductions and TTI has enabled aggressive
     // interleaving for reductions, we will interleave to expose ILP.
-    if (VF.isScalar() && AggressivelyInterleaveReductions) {
+    if (VF.isScalar() && AggressivelyInterleave) {
       LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Interleaving to expose ILP.\n");
       // Interleave no less than SmallIC but not as aggressive as the normal IC
       // to satisfy the rare situation when resources are too limited.
@@ -4964,7 +4964,7 @@ LoopVectorizationPlanner::selectInterleaveCount(VPlan &Plan, ElementCount VF,
 
   // Interleave if this is a large loop (small loops are already dealt with by
   // this point) that could benefit from interleaving.
-  if (AggressivelyInterleaveReductions) {
+  if (AggressivelyInterleave) {
     LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Interleaving to expose ILP.\n");
     return IC;
   }