[llvm] [X86][BreakFalseDeps] Using reverse order for undef register selection (PR #137569)

[Simon Pilgrim via llvm-commits]

================
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ define <2 x double> @fpext01(<2 x double> %a0, <4 x float> %a1) nounwind {
 define double @funcA(ptr nocapture %e) nounwind uwtable readonly ssp {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: funcA:
 ; CHECK:       # %bb.0:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    vcvtsi2sdq (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vcvtsi2sdq (%rdi), %xmm15, %xmm0
----------------
RKSimon wrote:

won't this cause codebloat by encouraging the use of the xmm8-15 registers?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/137569