[llvm] [Xtensa] Implement lowering SELECT_CC, SETCC. (PR #97017)
Andrei Safronov via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 9 07:37:01 PDT 2024
================
@@ -697,6 +718,126 @@ const char *XtensaTargetLowering::getTargetNodeName(unsigned Opcode) const {
return "XtensaISD::PCREL_WRAPPER";
case XtensaISD::RET:
return "XtensaISD::RET";
+ case XtensaISD::SELECT_CC:
+ return "XtensaISD::SELECT_CC";
}
return nullptr;
}
+
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// Custom insertion
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+static int GetBranchKind(int Cond, bool &BrInv) {
+ switch (Cond) {
+ case ISD::SETEQ:
+ return Xtensa::BEQ;
+ case ISD::SETNE:
+ return Xtensa::BNE;
+ case ISD::SETLT:
+ return Xtensa::BLT;
+ case ISD::SETLE:
+ BrInv = true;
+ return Xtensa::BGE;
+ case ISD::SETGT:
+ BrInv = true;
+ return Xtensa::BLT;
+ case ISD::SETGE:
+ return Xtensa::BGE;
+ case ISD::SETULT:
+ return Xtensa::BLTU;
+ case ISD::SETULE:
+ BrInv = true;
----------------
andreisfr wrote:
I added patterns for brcc with ULE and UGT codes:
[ brcc operation](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ac634c8b08adef1da8114821fbb7ad8a70e994a2/llvm/lib/Target/Xtensa/XtensaInstrInfo.td#L419)
And the same approach is used in lowering SELECTCC.
So, your suggestion is to remove such ULE/UGT handling in code and use setCondCodeAction(CC, Expand) instead?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97017
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list