[llvm] [X86] Transform `(xor x, SIGN_BIT)` -> `(add x, SIGN_BIT)` 32 bit and smaller scalars (PR #83659)

via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Mar 2 11:14:12 PST 2024


goldsteinn wrote:

> > > We already do some of this in X86DAGToDAGISel::matchAddressRecursively - maybe see why these cases weren't working there?
> > 
> > 
> > I see:
> > ```
> >   case ISD::OR:
> >   case ISD::XOR:
> >     // See if we can treat the OR/XOR node as an ADD node.
> >     if (!CurDAG->isADDLike(N))
> >       break;
> >     [[fallthrough]];
> >   case ISD::ADD:
> >     if (!matchAdd(N, AM, Depth))
> >       return false;
> >     break;
> > ```
> > 
> > 
> >     
> >       
> >     
> > 
> >       
> >     
> > 
> >     
> >   
> > Which isn't quite the same, or is there another transform im missing?
> > But it looks to me like whatever we are doing in `DAGToDag` isn't handling non-i32 types.
> 
> I tested a patch that transforms `IsAddLike` to `add` in `DAGToDAG` and it has a lot of changes. Im going to replace this impl with that.

Ahh, its a TD pattern:
```
let AddedComplexity = 5 in {
def : Pat<(xor GR8:$src1, -128),
          (ADD8ri GR8:$src1, -128)>;
def : Pat<(xor GR16:$src1, -32768),
          (ADD16ri GR16:$src1, -32768)>;
def : Pat<(xor GR32:$src1, -2147483648),
          (ADD32ri GR32:$src1, -2147483648)>;
}
```

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83659


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list