[PATCH] D115302: GlobalsModRef should treat functions w/o nosync conservatively.

Johannes Doerfert via Phabricator via llvm-commits llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 9 14:29:33 PST 2021

Previous message: [PATCH] D115302: GlobalsModRef should treat functions w/o nosync conservatively.
Next message: [PATCH] D115302: GlobalsModRef should treat functions w/o nosync conservatively.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

jdoerfert added a comment.

Requiring `nosync` when you want to derive "no side-effect" seems agreed upon. Let's start there.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D115302/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D115302

Previous message: [PATCH] D115302: GlobalsModRef should treat functions w/o nosync conservatively.
Next message: [PATCH] D115302: GlobalsModRef should treat functions w/o nosync conservatively.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the llvm-commits mailing list