[PATCH] D88287: [NARY-REASSOCIATE] Support reassociation of min/max

[Evgeniy via Phabricator via llvm-commits]

ebrevnov added a comment.

> I actually think this patch should not have been reverted in the first place.
> SCEV is known to be not good with `undef`, i don't really see why we should start blocking on that now.
> So i would personally recommend to directly revert your revert.

If I'm getting it right you are OK to commit the patch in its current state. If this is the case please unblock it.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D88287/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D88287