[PATCH] D75291: Rename "llvm-gsym" and "llvm-gsymutil" to "gsymutil".

[Eric Christopher via llvm-commits]

I'd like llvm-dsymutil as well and then people just link to it. That said,
no strong opinions, it just seemed odd.

-eric

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:56 PM Adrian Prantl via Phabricator <
reviews at reviews.llvm.org> wrote:

> aprantl added a comment.
>
> In D75291#1896992 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75291#1896992>, @echristo
> wrote:
>
> > Most of the other tools are llvm- any reason for the change?
>
>
> I was the one to suggest this name, since I found it inconsistent to have
> `dsymutil` but `llvm-gsymutil`. The others are mostly called `llvm-` to
> differentiate them from preexisting tools  with the same name. I don't
> think it's necessary for a new tool; unless we want the prefix there it for
> marketing reasons?
>
>
> Repository:
>   rG LLVM Github Monorepo
>
> CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
>   https://reviews.llvm.org/D75291/new/
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D75291
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20200227/740929cb/attachment.html>