[PATCH] D75291: Rename "llvm-gsym" and "llvm-gsymutil" to "gsymutil".

[Greg Clayton via llvm-commits]

I am fine wither way. Anyone else have an opinion?

> On Feb 27, 2020, at 5:00 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'd like llvm-dsymutil as well and then people just link to it. That said, no strong opinions, it just seemed odd.
> 
> -eric
> 
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:56 PM Adrian Prantl via Phabricator <reviews at reviews.llvm.org <mailto:reviews at reviews.llvm.org>> wrote:
> aprantl added a comment.
> 
> In D75291#1896992 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75291#1896992 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75291#1896992>>, @echristo wrote:
> 
> > Most of the other tools are llvm- any reason for the change?
> 
> 
> I was the one to suggest this name, since I found it inconsistent to have `dsymutil` but `llvm-gsymutil`. The others are mostly called `llvm-` to differentiate them from preexisting tools  with the same name. I don't think it's necessary for a new tool; unless we want the prefix there it for marketing reasons?
> 
> 
> Repository:
>   rG LLVM Github Monorepo
> 
> CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
>   https://reviews.llvm.org/D75291/new/ <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75291/new/>
> 
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D75291 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75291>
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20200227/9944f2c9/attachment.html>