[PATCH] D12692: LLVM does not distinguish Cortex-M4 from Cortex-M4F neither Cortex-R5 from R5F
Meador Inge via llvm-commits
llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 8 09:54:09 PDT 2015
meadori added a subscriber: meadori.
================
Comment at: lib/Target/ARM/ARM.td:470
@@ -458,1 +469,3 @@
+ FeatureThumb2, FeatureNoARM, FeatureDB,
+ FeatureHWDiv, FeatureDSPThumb2,
FeatureT2XtPk, FeatureVFP4,
----------------
Do our processor names always correspond to real processor names? It was my understanding that there is no such thing as a "Cortex-M4F" processor: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-09/msg00184.html So, GCC & binutils definitely don't have "cortex-m4f".
FWIW, if we don't, then I think we should strive to always use actual processor names.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12692
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list