[PATCH] [Windows] Implementing backtracing of self
Zachary Turner
zturner at google.com
Thu Mar 5 10:17:45 PST 2015
What's the catch-call case then? Just return from the function and don't
print anything?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:13 AM David Majnemer <david.majnemer at gmail.com>
wrote:
> REPOSITORY
> rL LLVM
>
> ================
> Comment at: llvm/trunk/lib/Support/Windows/Signals.inc:181-183
> @@ +180,5 @@
> + machineType = IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_AMD64;
> +#else
> + machineType = IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_I386;
> +#endif
> +
> ----------------
> Might be good to make this guarded by `#elif define(_M_IX86)`.
>
> ================
> Comment at: llvm/trunk/lib/Support/Windows/Signals.inc:393
> @@ +392,3 @@
> + StackFrame.AddrFrame.Offset = Context.Rbp;
> +#else
> + StackFrame.AddrPC.Offset = Context.Eip;
> ----------------
> This should be `#elif defined(_M_IX86)`
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D8068
>
> EMAIL PREFERENCES
> http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150305/6206df9f/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list