Introduce StringBuilder utility around raw_string_ostream

[Reid Kleckner]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote:

>
> On 26/06/2014 03:16, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
>
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com <mailto:
>> alp at nuanti.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     I've made that change, plus a couple more updated uses, and landed
>>     this in r211749.
>>
>>
>> I don't understand why.
>>
>> I think my objection to the design direction stands, but I'm tired of
>> arguing pointlessly so I'm not going to restate things.
>>
>
> I actually do care about your suggestion Chandler.
>
> It's my understanding that, if we get that alternative scheme to work at
> some point and agree it's an improvement, it'll be entirely compatible with
> the important bug fixes and malloc reduction enabled by this commit, which
> is where the value lies.


I'm looking forward to cleaning up users of clang's name manglers with this
utility, if someone doesn't beat me to it.  Thanks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20140625/e3703054/attachment.html>