Introduce StringBuilder utility around raw_string_ostream
Alp Toker
alp at nuanti.com
Wed Jun 25 17:52:02 PDT 2014
On 26/06/2014 03:16, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com
> <mailto:alp at nuanti.com>> wrote:
>
> I've made that change, plus a couple more updated uses, and landed
> this in r211749.
>
>
> I don't understand why.
>
> I think my objection to the design direction stands, but I'm tired of
> arguing pointlessly so I'm not going to restate things.
I actually do care about your suggestion Chandler.
It's my understanding that, if we get that alternative scheme to work at
some point and agree it's an improvement, it'll be entirely compatible
with the important bug fixes and malloc reduction enabled by this
commit, which is where the value lies.
Alp.
--
http://www.nuanti.com
the browser experts
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list