[llvm-commits] [llvm] r113670 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h lib/CodeGen/PeepholeOptimizer.cpp lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.h
Gabor Greif
ggreif at gmail.com
Sat Sep 11 01:21:41 PDT 2010
Ugh, added the 64-bit version, that won't help you on ARM :-(
Here is 32-bit:
#############################
; *** IR Dump After Optimize for code generation ***
%struct.Foo = type { i8* }
define %struct.Foo* @_ZN3Foo7collectEj(%struct.Foo* %this, i32 %acc)
nounwind readonly align 2 {
entry:
%scevgep = getelementptr %struct.Foo* %this, i32 1 ; <%struct.Foo*>
[#uses=1]
br label %tailrecurse
tailrecurse: ; preds = %sw.bb,
%entry
%lsr.iv2 = phi %struct.Foo* [ %scevgep3, %sw.bb ], [ %scevgep,
%entry ] ; <%struct.Foo*> [#uses=3]
%lsr.iv = phi i32 [ %lsr.iv.next, %sw.bb ], [ 1, %entry ] ; <i32>
[#uses=2]
%acc.tr = phi i32 [ %or, %sw.bb ], [ %acc, %entry ] ; <i32>
[#uses=2]
%lsr.iv24 = bitcast %struct.Foo* %lsr.iv2 to i8** ; <i8**> [#uses=1]
%scevgep5 = getelementptr i8** %lsr.iv24, i32 -1 ; <i8**> [#uses=1]
%tmp2 = load i8** %scevgep5 ; <i8*> [#uses=1]
%0 = ptrtoint i8* %tmp2 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%and = and i32 %0, 3 ; <i32> [#uses=3]
%tst = icmp eq i32 %and, 0 ; <i1> [#uses=1]
br i1 %tst, label %sw.bb, label %tailrecurse.switch
tailrecurse.switch: ; preds =
%tailrecurse
switch i32 %and, label %sw.epilog [
i32 1, label %sw.bb
i32 3, label %sw.bb6
i32 2, label %sw.bb8
]
sw.bb: ; preds =
%tailrecurse.switch, %tailrecurse
%shl = shl i32 %acc.tr, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%or = or i32 %and, %shl ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%lsr.iv.next = add i32 %lsr.iv, 1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%scevgep3 = getelementptr %struct.Foo* %lsr.iv2, i32 1 ; <
%struct.Foo*> [#uses=1]
br label %tailrecurse
sw.bb6: ; preds =
%tailrecurse.switch
ret %struct.Foo* %lsr.iv2
sw.bb8: ; preds =
%tailrecurse.switch
%tmp1 = add i32 %acc.tr, %lsr.iv ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%add.ptr11 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.Foo* %this, i32 %tmp1 ; <
%struct.Foo*> [#uses=1]
ret %struct.Foo* %add.ptr11
sw.epilog: ; preds =
%tailrecurse.switch
ret %struct.Foo* undef
}
#############################
On 11 Sep., 09:49, Gabor Greif <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> you might be interested in my dabbling attempts
> withhttp://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8125
> The x86 peephole already manages to eliminate
> the test after the 'and', It would be interesting
> to see whether ARM does too.
> Btw., my commit is not really restricted to 'and',
> any operation that sets the zero flag will do.
>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list