[llvm-bugs] [Bug 50344] clang 12.0.0 ignores copy constructor and fails to compile seemingly correct code

[via llvm-bugs]

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50344

Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
                 CC|                            |efriedma at quicinc.com
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com> ---
I think you're misinterpreting "only the copy constructor is provided". 
There's a difference between a class that doesn't have a move constructor, and
one that has an explicitly deleted move constructor.  A class with a deleted
move constructor has a move constructor.  The compiler doesn't check whether a
constructor is deleted until after it decides which constructor to use.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20210514/a0d0cf61/attachment.html>