<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.llvm.org/">
    </head>
    <body><span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:efriedma@quicinc.com" title="Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com>"> <span class="fn">Eli Friedman</span></a>
</span> changed
          <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - clang 12.0.0 ignores copy constructor and fails to compile seemingly correct code"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50344">bug 50344</a>
          <br>
             <table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8">
          <tr>
            <th>What</th>
            <th>Removed</th>
            <th>Added</th>
          </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Resolution</td>
           <td>---
           </td>
           <td>INVALID
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">CC</td>
           <td>
                
           </td>
           <td>efriedma@quicinc.com
           </td>
         </tr>

         <tr>
           <td style="text-align:right;">Status</td>
           <td>NEW
           </td>
           <td>RESOLVED
           </td>
         </tr></table>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - clang 12.0.0 ignores copy constructor and fails to compile seemingly correct code"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50344#c1">Comment # 1</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_RESOLVED  bz_closed"
   title="RESOLVED INVALID - clang 12.0.0 ignores copy constructor and fails to compile seemingly correct code"
   href="https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50344">bug 50344</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:efriedma@quicinc.com" title="Eli Friedman <efriedma@quicinc.com>"> <span class="fn">Eli Friedman</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>I think you're misinterpreting "only the copy constructor is provided". 
There's a difference between a class that doesn't have a move constructor, and
one that has an explicitly deleted move constructor.  A class with a deleted
move constructor has a move constructor.  The compiler doesn't check whether a
constructor is deleted until after it decides which constructor to use.</pre>
        </div>
      </p>


      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>

      <ul>
          <li>You are on the CC list for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>