[llvm-bugs] [llvm-dev] Clang is a resource hog, the installers for Windows miss quite some files, and are defect!

[Eric Christopher via llvm-bugs]

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 5:32 PM Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

> "Philip Reames" <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote:
>
> > Stefan,
> >
> > I can't tell if you're intentionally trolling, or are simply oblivious,
> > but to this observer you have clearly crossed well over the line of
> > acceptable behavior.
>
> Since you seem to have some experience in taking the point of view of a
> third person: do you find LLVM's "behaviour" of wasting its customers
> resources (nearly 0.5GB of the total 1.5GB for every installed package
> on Windows) acceptable?
> Or that your customers have to install separate FULL packages for every
> target architecture instead of just the few runtime libraries?
>
> > Please take a step back, walk away from a couple of days, and if you
> > want to reengage with a calmer perspective at that time, then do so.
>
> Take a step back and change your point of view until you get the right
> perspective, then fix the couple of bugs I presented!
>
>
Please take that step back that Philip requested. We do appreciate the bug
reports,
but not the delivery.

Thanks and have a good weekend.

-eric


> Stefan
>
> > On 8/21/20 10:41 AM, Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev wrote:
> >> "David Greene" <dag at hpe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
> >>>
> >>>> "Michael Kruse" <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I think David is not referring to the capitalization of file names,
> but to
> >>>>> "DUPLICATE", "WASTING", "NOT AMUSED", "BOGUS" etc.
> >>>> I EMPHASIZE in the only way possible with plain text.
> >>> There are *many* ways to _emphasize_ text without shouting.
> >>>                                           ~~~~~~~
> >> How ugly; I prefer UPPER CASE!
> >>
> >>>>> It should be possible to report problems in a professional manner.
> >>>> It should also be possible to handle problem reports in a professional
> >>>> manner!
> >>>  From everything I have read, both Michael and David were very
> >>> professional in their responses.
> >> Both had nothing better to do than to mock about my way of emphasizing!
> >> That's childish and completely unprofessional.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>>> I don't use LLVM, so don't expect me to jump throught loops to report
> >>>> obvious bugs.
> >>> I guess I don't understand your concern then.  If you don't use LLVM,
> >>> why are you installing it and why do you care about its size?
> >> Who said I installed it?
> >> Some poor soul installed it because he got the advice to use LLVM/clang
> >> because "it is better than MinGW or MSVC/Visual Studio".
> >> After that he wondered why he can compile for i386, but can't link the
> >> compiled objects ... so he asked me.
> >> I VOLUNTARILY took my time to see what was installed, and how it was
> >> installed: I noticed the wasted 0.5GB and the missing
> clang-rt.*-i386.lib
> >> He was DEFINITELY not amused, and called the $*%@ who built this crap
> >> names.
> >>
> >> I but dared to copy clang-rt.builtins-{i386,x86-64}.lib and verified the
> >> still POOR performance, especially for 64-bit division on i386 and
> 128-bit
> >> division on AMD64.
> >>
> >> JFTR: __udivmoddi4 and __udivmodti4 are even slower than in LLVM 7.0.0!
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>>>> There are multiple potential equivalents to symlinks on Windows
> systems,
> >>>>> the one matching UNIX systems the closest is relatively new and
> requires
> >>>>> either Administrator rights or developer mode turned on.
> >>>> Hardlinks don't. And they are available on both systems.
> >>> They aren't available on FAT32 filesystems though.
> >> The DEFAULT installation directory is on NTFS.
> >>
> >> JFTR: since Windows Vista, introduced 14 years ago, the boot partition
> >>        must be NTFS.
> >>
> >> Stefan
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> >> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20200821/b1c9e6d8/attachment.html>