[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [LoopInterchange] Reject interchange when AnyOf reduction exists (PR #202092)

Ryotaro Kasuga via llvm-branch-commits llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Jun 7 09:44:21 PDT 2026


https://github.com/kasuga-fj updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/202092

>From 1f7c5f112d884c5223aa6b613eb5958faab19bc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ryotaro Kasuga <kasuga.ryotaro at fujitsu.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2026 08:00:03 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] [LoopInterchange] Reject interchange when AnyOf reduction
 exists

---
 .../lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp | 17 +++++++++-
 .../LoopInterchange/reduction-anyof.ll        | 32 ++++++-------------
 .../reductions-non-wrapped-operations.ll      |  9 ++++--
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp
index e235249e83475..cb1327b75260f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopInterchange.cpp
@@ -1010,9 +1010,24 @@ static bool checkReductionKind(Loop *L, PHINode *PHI,
     case RecurKind::SMax:
     case RecurKind::UMin:
     case RecurKind::UMax:
-    case RecurKind::AnyOf:
       return true;
 
+    // Interchanging the loops that contain AnyOf reduction is not always legal.
+    // Especially, when the result value of the AnyOf is not loop-invariant with
+    // respect to the outer loop, interchanging may change the semantics. The
+    // following is an example of such case:
+    //   int A = {{ 1, 0 }, { 0, 1 }};
+    //   int red = 0;
+    //   for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
+    //     for (int j = 0; j < 2; j++)
+    //       red = (A[j][i] == 0) ? i + 1 : red;
+    //
+    // TODO: We may be able to support interchanging loops with AnyOf reduction
+    // by checking the operand of the reduction is loop-invariant with respect
+    // to the outer loop as well.
+    case RecurKind::AnyOf:
+      return false;
+
     // Changing the order of floating-point operations may alter the results. If
     // a certain instruction has the ninf flag, it means that reordering can
     // produce a poison value, which may lead to undefined behavior. To prevent
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/reduction-anyof.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/reduction-anyof.ll
index 9346e76db2a60..edb8403908537 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/reduction-anyof.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/reduction-anyof.ll
@@ -14,46 +14,34 @@
 ; In the original code, the final value of `red` is 2, but if the loops are
 ; interchanged, the final value of `red` becomes 1.
 ;
-; FIXME: The loops are now interchanged.
-;
 define i8 @reduce_anyof(ptr %A) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: define i8 @reduce_anyof(
 ; CHECK-SAME: ptr [[A:%.*]]) {
-; CHECK-NEXT:  [[FOR_I_HEADER_PREHEADER:.*:]]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[FOR_I_HEADER:.*]]
-; CHECK:       [[FOR_I_HEADER_PREHEADER1:.*]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:  [[FOR_I_HEADER_PREHEADER1:.*]]:
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[FOR_I_HEADER1:.*]]
 ; CHECK:       [[FOR_I_HEADER1]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[I:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[I_INC:%.*]], %[[FOR_I_LATCH:.*]] ], [ 0, %[[FOR_I_HEADER_PREHEADER1]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[RED:%.*]] = phi i8 [ [[SEL:%.*]], %[[FOR_I_LATCH]] ], [ [[RED_OUTER:%.*]], %[[FOR_I_HEADER_PREHEADER1]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[I:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[FOR_I_HEADER_PREHEADER1]] ], [ [[I_INC:%.*]], %[[FOR_I_LATCH:.*]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[RED_OUTER:%.*]] = phi i8 [ 0, %[[FOR_I_HEADER_PREHEADER1]] ], [ [[RED_LCSSA:%.*]], %[[FOR_I_LATCH]] ]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[ADD:%.*]] = add i64 [[I]], 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[ADD8:%.*]] = trunc i64 [[ADD]] to i8
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[FOR_J_SPLIT1:.*]]
-; CHECK:       [[FOR_I_HEADER]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[FOR_J:.*]]
-; CHECK:       [[FOR_J]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[J:%.*]] = phi i64 [ [[TMP2:%.*]], %[[FOR_J_SPLIT2:.*]] ], [ 0, %[[FOR_I_HEADER]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[RED_OUTER]] = phi i8 [ [[RED_LCSSA:%.*]], %[[FOR_J_SPLIT2]] ], [ 0, %[[FOR_I_HEADER]] ]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[FOR_I_HEADER_PREHEADER1]]
 ; CHECK:       [[FOR_J_SPLIT1]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[J:%.*]] = phi i64 [ 0, %[[FOR_I_HEADER1]] ], [ [[TMP2:%.*]], %[[FOR_J_SPLIT1]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[RED:%.*]] = phi i8 [ [[RED_OUTER]], %[[FOR_I_HEADER1]] ], [ [[SEL:%.*]], %[[FOR_J_SPLIT1]] ]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[ARRAYIDX:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds [2 x i8], ptr [[A]], i64 [[J]], i64 [[I]]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[LV:%.*]] = load i8, ptr [[ARRAYIDX]], align 4
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[CMP:%.*]] = icmp eq i8 [[LV]], 0
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[SEL]] = select i1 [[CMP]], i8 [[ADD8]], i8 [[RED]]
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP0:%.*]] = add i64 [[J]], 1
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP1:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[TMP0]], 2
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br label %[[FOR_I_LATCH]]
-; CHECK:       [[FOR_J_SPLIT2]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[RED_LCSSA]] = phi i8 [ [[SEL]], %[[FOR_I_LATCH]] ]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP2]] = add i64 [[J]], 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[TMP3:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[TMP2]], 2
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[TMP3]], label %[[FOR_J_SPLIT:.*]], label %[[FOR_J]]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[TMP3]], label %[[FOR_I_LATCH]], label %[[FOR_J_SPLIT1]]
 ; CHECK:       [[FOR_I_LATCH]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[RED_LCSSA]] = phi i8 [ [[SEL]], %[[FOR_J_SPLIT1]] ]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[I_INC]] = add i64 [[I]], 1
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    [[EC_I:%.*]] = icmp eq i64 [[I_INC]], 2
-; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EC_I]], label %[[FOR_J_SPLIT2]], label %[[FOR_I_HEADER1]]
-; CHECK:       [[FOR_J_SPLIT]]:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    [[RES:%.*]] = phi i8 [ [[RED_LCSSA]], %[[FOR_J_SPLIT2]] ]
+; CHECK-NEXT:    br i1 [[EC_I]], label %[[FOR_J_SPLIT2:.*]], label %[[FOR_I_HEADER1]]
+; CHECK:       [[FOR_J_SPLIT2]]:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    [[RES:%.*]] = phi i8 [ [[RED_LCSSA]], %[[FOR_I_LATCH]] ]
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret i8 [[RES]]
 ;
 entry:
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/reductions-non-wrapped-operations.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/reductions-non-wrapped-operations.ll
index f5c6ad7889366..a1404b83cea4a 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/reductions-non-wrapped-operations.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/reductions-non-wrapped-operations.ll
@@ -293,17 +293,20 @@ exit:
 }
 
 
-; Check that interchanging the loops is legal for the any-of reduction.
+; Interchanging the loops with AnyOf reduction is not necessarily legal. In
+; this case it should be legal, but we conservatively reject it at the moment.
 ;
 ; int any_of = 0;
 ; for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
 ;   for (int j = 0; j < 2; j++)
 ;     any_of = (A[j][i] == 42) ? 1 : any_of;
 
-; CHECK:      --- !Pass
+; CHECK:      --- !Missed
 ; CHECK-NEXT: Pass:            loop-interchange
-; CHECK-NEXT: Name:            Interchanged
+; CHECK-NEXT: Name:            UnsupportedPHIOuter
 ; CHECK-NEXT: Function:        reduction_anyof
+; CHECK-NEXT: Args:
+; CHECK-NEXT:  - String:         Only outer loops with induction or reduction PHI nodes
 define void @reduction_anyof(ptr %A) {
 entry:
   br label %for.i.header



More information about the llvm-branch-commits mailing list