[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] CodeGen: Handle bundled instructions in two-address-instructions pass (PR #166212)

[via llvm-branch-commits]

github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp -- llvm/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
index 713ef7795..264e6c866 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
@@ -1670,9 +1670,8 @@ void TwoAddressInstructionImpl::processTiedPairs(MachineInstr *MI,
     if (MI->isBundle()) {
       for (MachineOperand &MO : mi_bundle_ops(*MI)) {
         if (MO.isReg() && MO.getReg() == RegB) {
-          assert(
-              MO.getSubReg() == 0 &&
-              "tied subregister uses in bundled instructions not supported");
+          assert(MO.getSubReg() == 0 &&
+                 "tied subregister uses in bundled instructions not supported");
           MO.setReg(RegA);
         }
       }

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166212