[llvm-branch-commits] [clang] 12a11dc - [Clang][NFC] Simplify initialization of `OverloadCandidate` objects. (#100318)
Tobias Hieta via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 26 00:25:07 PDT 2024
Author: cor3ntin
Date: 2024-07-26T09:24:55+02:00
New Revision: 12a11dc676fd36d790b705b918597877fb34772a
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/12a11dc676fd36d790b705b918597877fb34772a
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/12a11dc676fd36d790b705b918597877fb34772a.diff
LOG: [Clang][NFC] Simplify initialization of `OverloadCandidate` objects. (#100318)
Initialize some fields of OverloadCandidate in its constructor. The goal
here is try to fix read of uninitialized variable (which I was not able
to reproduce)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93430#issuecomment-2187544278
We should certainly try to improve the construction of
`OverloadCandidate` further as it can be quite britle.
(cherry picked from commit 7d787df5b932b73aae6532d1e981152f103f9244)
Added:
Modified:
clang/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h
clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h b/clang/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h
index 9d8b797af6663..26ffe057c74a2 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Sema/Overload.h
@@ -998,7 +998,9 @@ class Sema;
private:
friend class OverloadCandidateSet;
OverloadCandidate()
- : IsSurrogate(false), IsADLCandidate(CallExpr::NotADL), RewriteKind(CRK_None) {}
+ : IsSurrogate(false), IgnoreObjectArgument(false),
+ TookAddressOfOverload(false), IsADLCandidate(CallExpr::NotADL),
+ RewriteKind(CRK_None) {}
};
/// OverloadCandidateSet - A set of overload candidates, used in C++
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
index a8d250fbabfed..554a2df14bea6 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -6857,10 +6857,7 @@ void Sema::AddOverloadCandidate(
Candidate.Viable = true;
Candidate.RewriteKind =
CandidateSet.getRewriteInfo().getRewriteKind(Function, PO);
- Candidate.IsSurrogate = false;
Candidate.IsADLCandidate = IsADLCandidate;
- Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument = false;
- Candidate.TookAddressOfOverload = false;
Candidate.ExplicitCallArguments = Args.size();
// Explicit functions are not actually candidates at all if we're not
@@ -7422,8 +7419,6 @@ Sema::AddMethodCandidate(CXXMethodDecl *Method, DeclAccessPair FoundDecl,
Candidate.Function = Method;
Candidate.RewriteKind =
CandidateSet.getRewriteInfo().getRewriteKind(Method, PO);
- Candidate.IsSurrogate = false;
- Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument = false;
Candidate.TookAddressOfOverload =
CandidateSet.getKind() == OverloadCandidateSet::CSK_AddressOfOverloadSet;
Candidate.ExplicitCallArguments = Args.size();
@@ -7617,7 +7612,6 @@ void Sema::AddMethodTemplateCandidate(
Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument =
cast<CXXMethodDecl>(Candidate.Function)->isStatic() ||
ObjectType.isNull();
- Candidate.TookAddressOfOverload = false;
Candidate.ExplicitCallArguments = Args.size();
if (Result == TemplateDeductionResult::NonDependentConversionFailure)
Candidate.FailureKind = ovl_fail_bad_conversion;
@@ -7705,7 +7699,6 @@ void Sema::AddTemplateOverloadCandidate(
Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument =
isa<CXXMethodDecl>(Candidate.Function) &&
!isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(Candidate.Function);
- Candidate.TookAddressOfOverload = false;
Candidate.ExplicitCallArguments = Args.size();
if (Result == TemplateDeductionResult::NonDependentConversionFailure)
Candidate.FailureKind = ovl_fail_bad_conversion;
@@ -7886,9 +7879,6 @@ void Sema::AddConversionCandidate(
OverloadCandidate &Candidate = CandidateSet.addCandidate(1);
Candidate.FoundDecl = FoundDecl;
Candidate.Function = Conversion;
- Candidate.IsSurrogate = false;
- Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument = false;
- Candidate.TookAddressOfOverload = false;
Candidate.FinalConversion.setAsIdentityConversion();
Candidate.FinalConversion.setFromType(ConvType);
Candidate.FinalConversion.setAllToTypes(ToType);
@@ -8084,9 +8074,6 @@ void Sema::AddTemplateConversionCandidate(
Candidate.Function = FunctionTemplate->getTemplatedDecl();
Candidate.Viable = false;
Candidate.FailureKind = ovl_fail_bad_deduction;
- Candidate.IsSurrogate = false;
- Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument = false;
- Candidate.TookAddressOfOverload = false;
Candidate.ExplicitCallArguments = 1;
Candidate.DeductionFailure = MakeDeductionFailureInfo(Context, Result,
Info);
@@ -8119,10 +8106,8 @@ void Sema::AddSurrogateCandidate(CXXConversionDecl *Conversion,
Candidate.FoundDecl = FoundDecl;
Candidate.Function = nullptr;
Candidate.Surrogate = Conversion;
- Candidate.Viable = true;
Candidate.IsSurrogate = true;
- Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument = false;
- Candidate.TookAddressOfOverload = false;
+ Candidate.Viable = true;
Candidate.ExplicitCallArguments = Args.size();
// Determine the implicit conversion sequence for the implicit
@@ -8328,9 +8313,6 @@ void Sema::AddBuiltinCandidate(QualType *ParamTys, ArrayRef<Expr *> Args,
OverloadCandidate &Candidate = CandidateSet.addCandidate(Args.size());
Candidate.FoundDecl = DeclAccessPair::make(nullptr, AS_none);
Candidate.Function = nullptr;
- Candidate.IsSurrogate = false;
- Candidate.IgnoreObjectArgument = false;
- Candidate.TookAddressOfOverload = false;
std::copy(ParamTys, ParamTys + Args.size(), Candidate.BuiltinParamTypes);
// Determine the implicit conversion sequences for each of the
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list