[llvm-branch-commits] [llvm] [BOLT] Match blocks with pseudo probes (PR #99891)
Shaw Young via llvm-branch-commits
llvm-branch-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jul 24 15:47:11 PDT 2024
================
@@ -223,10 +249,31 @@ class StaleMatcher {
return Hash1.InstrHash == Hash2.InstrHash;
}
+ /// Returns true if a profiled block was matched with its pseudo probe.
+ bool isPseudoProbeMatch(BlendedBlockHash YamlBBHash) {
+ return MatchedWithPseudoProbes.find(YamlBBHash.combine()) !=
+ MatchedWithPseudoProbes.end();
+ }
+
+ /// Returns the number of blocks matched with opcodes.
+ size_t getNumBlocksMatchedWithOpcodes() const { return MatchedWithOpcodes; }
+
+ /// Returns the number of blocks matched with pseudo probes.
+ size_t getNumBlocksMatchedWithPseudoProbes() const {
+ return MatchedWithPseudoProbes.size();
+ }
+
private:
using HashBlockPairType = std::pair<BlendedBlockHash, FlowBlock *>;
std::unordered_map<uint16_t, std::vector<HashBlockPairType>> OpHashToBlocks;
std::unordered_map<uint64_t, std::vector<HashBlockPairType>> CallHashToBlocks;
+ std::unordered_map<uint64_t, std::vector<const MCDecodedPseudoProbe *>>
----------------
shawbyoung wrote:
I wanted to keep the mappings used within StaleMatcher consistent, but since I'm initializing pseudo probe mappings and iterating on the StaleMatcher differently anyways, I'll change these to LLVM ADT.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99891
More information about the llvm-branch-commits
mailing list