[lldb-dev] intermittent tests - moving to XFAIL rather than skip

[Todd Fiala]

Okay, thanks Ed!

Sorry for any churn on your buildbot there.

-Todd


On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 10 July 2014 21:02, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I had been operating under the assumption that a test marked XFAIL
> (expected
> > failure) that passes (which gets categorized as an "unexpected success")
> > would fail the test run.  I have recently learned in the last few days
> that
> > this is not true - the unexpected success does get captured in the logs
> and
> > does show up as a 'u' in the test run, but it doesn't cause the entire
> test
> > process exit code to fail in the way that one or more failed tests would.
>
> Hi Todd,
>
> I noticed on the FreeBSD buildbot that the run reports a failure for
> unexpected passes.  I agree with your change though and will switch
> the FreeBSD tests that are being skipped to XFAIL as well.  If that
> causes grief on the buildbots we can look at having them accept
> unexpected passes.
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>



-- 
Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | tfiala at google.com | 650-943-3180
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20140710/ab55c8a0/attachment.html>