[lldb-dev] intermittent tests - moving to XFAIL rather than skip

[Ed Maste]

On 10 July 2014 21:02, Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:
> I had been operating under the assumption that a test marked XFAIL (expected
> failure) that passes (which gets categorized as an "unexpected success")
> would fail the test run.  I have recently learned in the last few days that
> this is not true - the unexpected success does get captured in the logs and
> does show up as a 'u' in the test run, but it doesn't cause the entire test
> process exit code to fail in the way that one or more failed tests would.

Hi Todd,

I noticed on the FreeBSD buildbot that the run reports a failure for
unexpected passes.  I agree with your change though and will switch
the FreeBSD tests that are being skipped to XFAIL as well.  If that
causes grief on the buildbots we can look at having them accept
unexpected passes.