[lldb-dev] Help with C++ API

[Jakob Leben]

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Jakob Leben <jakob.leben at gmail.com> wrote:

> SBValue should offer as children *anything* that is offered by *any* STL
> container as its elements, and furthermore that this becomes a de-facto
> simple and elegant definition of SBValue semantics with regard to children
> and with regard to STL containers.


After all, it would actually make a lot of sense to me to have a separate
API (C++ class) for "synthetic" (better named "formatted") observation of
complex data structures, as opposed to having a single boolean flag in
SBValue control such a drastic distinction between SBValue API semantics
with regard to the concept of "children".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20130828/84facc9d/attachment.html>