[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D116351: Update Bug report URL to Github Issues

[Fangrui Song via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

MaskRay added inline comments.


================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/index.rst:220
 * `libc++abi Homepage <http://libcxxabi.llvm.org/>`_
-* `LLVM Bugzilla <https://bugs.llvm.org/>`_
+* `LLVM Issues <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/>`_
 * `libcxx-commits Mailing List`_
----------------
Quuxplusone wrote:
> ksyx wrote:
> > MaskRay wrote:
> > > Quuxplusone wrote:
> > > > 
> > > Would https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/labels/libc++ be better?
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately "New issue" on that page does not apply the label automatically.
> > Adding parameter like in <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/new?labels=ABI> could be the most direct way of doing this, given the label exists, so do assignee (untested)? Besides, the new 
> > [[ https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/syntax-for-issue-forms | Issue Forms ]] feature of GitHub is also a good idea that also unifys what to fill out in a request and what to automatically do with the issue.
> Given that you are using the "search for label" URLs in the other places now, I think (for consistency) it //does// make sense to change this one to `https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/labels/libc++/`. (With or without the trailing slash, but be consistent.)
> 
> Please do //not// hard-code any links to `https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/new`-anything; IMHO that makes it far too likely that people (or robots) who click there will end up creating a new spam issue by accident. Someone who's found a bug to report should be taken to the //search page// (to search and see if it's already been filed). Taking them straight to "create a (probably spam) issue" is completely counterproductive.
It's always important to check existing issues before filing a new one. I agree `/new` should be avoided.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D116351/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D116351